Skill Market

investor materials

投資家向けマテリアル、ピッチデック、財務プレゼンテーション、およびビジネス概要。

GitHub
githubcommunity
0.0
0 installs262.1K GitHub starsby affaan-m

Skill Introduction

Overview
投資家向けマテリアル、ピッチデック、財務プレゼンテーション、およびビジネス概要。

Core value

Turns reusable Documentation know-how into an installable skill, helping users complete github, community work faster.

Target users

  • Developers, testers, and maintainers who handle Documentation tasks in Focus Code.
  • Teams that already trust workflows or content from affaan-m.
  • Users who want standardized prompts, steps, or conventions instead of repeating setup work.

Best practices

  • Read the skill content first to confirm required inputs, expected outputs, and dependencies.
  • Try it on a small task before relying on it for critical work.
  • Add project-specific constraints such as coding style, target platform, test expectations, and delivery format.
  • For external sources, verify the source link, version, and recent maintenance activity.

Best use cases

  • Tasks related to github, community that need a reusable execution flow.
  • Converting a community repo, team convention, or personal workflow into day-to-day assistance.
  • Starting from a proven skill instead of writing prompts or procedures from scratch.

Limits and boundaries

  • Results depend on the quality of the original skill content and may need human correction.
  • It does not replace code review, tests, security review, or professional judgment.
  • External tools, APIs, account permissions, and local dependencies still need separate setup.

Differentiation

  • Structured around Documentation, making it easier to discover and reuse than loose prompt snippets.
  • Marked as GitHub, which helps users judge trust and maintenance expectations.
  • Keeps the original source link available for repository, documentation, or discussion follow-up.
  • Tagged with github, community, so it can be filtered by concrete task intent.

Install and use

Install
Copy Install Command
focus install investor-materials-638547
View source

Detail Preview

SKILL.md

Primary filemarkdown3 KB

name: investor-materials description: 投資家向けマテリアル、ピッチデック、財務プレゼンテーション、およびビジネス概要。 origin: ECC

Investor Materials

Build investor-facing materials that are consistent, credible, and easy to defend.

When to Activate

  • creating or revising a pitch deck
  • writing an investor memo or one-pager
  • building a financial model, milestone plan, or use-of-funds table
  • answering accelerator or incubator application questions
  • aligning multiple fundraising docs around one source of truth

Golden Rule

All investor materials must agree with each other.

Create or confirm a single source of truth before writing:

  • traction metrics
  • pricing and revenue assumptions
  • raise size and instrument
  • use of funds
  • team bios and titles
  • milestones and timelines

If conflicting numbers appear, stop and resolve them before drafting.

Core Workflow

  1. inventory the canonical facts
  2. identify missing assumptions
  3. choose the asset type
  4. draft the asset with explicit logic
  5. cross-check every number against the source of truth

Asset Guidance

Pitch Deck

Recommended flow:

  1. company + wedge
  2. problem
  3. solution
  4. product / demo
  5. market
  6. business model
  7. traction
  8. team
  9. competition / differentiation
  10. ask
  11. use of funds / milestones
  12. appendix

If the user wants a web-native deck, pair this skill with frontend-slides.

One-Pager / Memo

  • state what the company does in one clean sentence
  • show why now
  • include traction and proof points early
  • make the ask precise
  • keep claims easy to verify

Financial Model

Include:

  • explicit assumptions
  • bear / base / bull cases when useful
  • clean layer-by-layer revenue logic
  • milestone-linked spending
  • sensitivity analysis where the decision hinges on assumptions

Accelerator Applications

  • answer the exact question asked
  • prioritize traction, insight, and team advantage
  • avoid puffery
  • keep internal metrics consistent with the deck and model

Red Flags to Avoid

  • unverifiable claims
  • fuzzy market sizing without assumptions
  • inconsistent team roles or titles
  • revenue math that does not sum cleanly
  • inflated certainty where assumptions are fragile

Quality Gate

Before delivering:

  • every number matches the current source of truth
  • use of funds and revenue layers sum correctly
  • assumptions are visible, not buried
  • the story is clear without hype language
  • the final asset is defensible in a partner meeting

Reviews

Overall rating

0.0
0.0

0 comments

No reviews yet