Skill Market

decision logger

Two-layer memory architecture for board meeting decisions. Manages raw transcripts (Layer 1) and approved decisions (Layer 2). Use when logging decisions after a board meeting, reviewing past decisions with /cs:decisions, or checking overdue action items with /cs:review. Invoked automatically by the board-meeting skill after Phase 5 founder approval.

GitHub
githubcommunity
0.0
0 installs26.1K GitHub starsby alirezarezvani

Skill Introduction

Overview
Two-layer memory architecture for board meeting decisions. Manages raw transcripts (Layer 1) and approved decisions (Layer 2). Use when logging decisions after a board meeting, reviewing past decisions with /cs:decisions, or checking overdue action items with /cs:review. Invoked automatically by the board-meeting skill after Phase 5 founder approval.

Core value

Turns reusable Development know-how into an installable skill, helping users complete github, community work faster.

Target users

  • Developers, testers, and maintainers who handle Development tasks in Focus Code.
  • Teams that already trust workflows or content from alirezarezvani.
  • Users who want standardized prompts, steps, or conventions instead of repeating setup work.

Best practices

  • Read the skill content first to confirm required inputs, expected outputs, and dependencies.
  • Try it on a small task before relying on it for critical work.
  • Add project-specific constraints such as coding style, target platform, test expectations, and delivery format.
  • For external sources, verify the source link, version, and recent maintenance activity.

Best use cases

  • Tasks related to github, community that need a reusable execution flow.
  • Converting a community repo, team convention, or personal workflow into day-to-day assistance.
  • Starting from a proven skill instead of writing prompts or procedures from scratch.

Limits and boundaries

  • Results depend on the quality of the original skill content and may need human correction.
  • It does not replace code review, tests, security review, or professional judgment.
  • External tools, APIs, account permissions, and local dependencies still need separate setup.

Differentiation

  • Structured around Development, making it easier to discover and reuse than loose prompt snippets.
  • Marked as GitHub, which helps users judge trust and maintenance expectations.
  • Keeps the original source link available for repository, documentation, or discussion follow-up.
  • Tagged with github, community, so it can be filtered by concrete task intent.

Install and use

Install
Copy Install Command
focus install decision-logger-91b17e
View source

Detail Preview

SKILL.md

Primary filemarkdown5 KB

name: "decision-logger" description: "Two-layer memory architecture for board meeting decisions. Manages raw transcripts (Layer 1) and approved decisions (Layer 2). Use when logging decisions after a board meeting, reviewing past decisions with /cs:decisions, or checking overdue action items with /cs:review. Invoked automatically by the board-meeting skill after Phase 5 founder approval." license: MIT metadata: version: 1.0.0 author: Alireza Rezvani category: c-level domain: decision-memory updated: 2026-03-05 python-tools: scripts/decision_tracker.py

Decision Logger

Two-layer memory system. Layer 1 stores everything. Layer 2 stores only what the founder approved. Future meetings read Layer 2 only — this prevents hallucinated consensus from past debates bleeding into new deliberations.

Keywords

decision log, memory, approved decisions, action items, board minutes, /cs:decisions, /cs:review, conflict detection, DO_NOT_RESURFACE

Quick Start

python scripts/decision_tracker.py --demo             # See sample output
python scripts/decision_tracker.py --summary          # Overview + overdue
python scripts/decision_tracker.py --overdue          # Past-deadline actions
python scripts/decision_tracker.py --conflicts        # Contradiction detection
python scripts/decision_tracker.py --owner "CTO"      # Filter by owner
python scripts/decision_tracker.py --search "pricing" # Search decisions

Commands

CommandEffect
/cs:decisionsLast 10 approved decisions
/cs:decisions --allFull history
/cs:decisions --owner CMOFilter by owner
/cs:decisions --topic pricingSearch by keyword
/cs:reviewAction items due within 7 days
/cs:review --overdueItems past deadline

Two-Layer Architecture

Layer 1 — Raw Transcripts

Location: memory/board-meetings/YYYY-MM-DD-raw.md

  • Full Phase 2 agent contributions, Phase 3 critique, Phase 4 synthesis
  • All debates, including rejected arguments
  • NEVER auto-loaded. Only on explicit founder request.
  • Archive after 90 days → memory/board-meetings/archive/YYYY/

Layer 2 — Approved Decisions

Location: memory/board-meetings/decisions.md

  • ONLY founder-approved decisions, action items, user corrections
  • Loaded automatically in Phase 1 of every board meeting
  • Append-only. Decisions are never deleted — only superseded.
  • Managed by Chief of Staff after Phase 5. Never written by agents directly.

Decision Entry Format

## [YYYY-MM-DD] — [AGENDA ITEM TITLE]

**Decision:** [One clear statement of what was decided.]
**Owner:** [One person or role — accountable for execution.]
**Deadline:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Review:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Rationale:** [Why this over alternatives. 1-2 sentences.]

**User Override:** [If founder changed agent recommendation — what and why. Blank if not applicable.]

**Rejected:**
- [Proposal] — [reason] [DO_NOT_RESURFACE]

**Action Items:**
- [ ] [Action] — Owner: [name] — Due: [YYYY-MM-DD] — Review: [YYYY-MM-DD]

**Supersedes:** [DATE of previous decision on same topic, if any]
**Superseded by:** [Filled in retroactively if overridden later]
**Raw transcript:** memory/board-meetings/[DATE]-raw.md

Conflict Detection

Before logging, Chief of Staff checks for:

  1. DO_NOT_RESURFACE violations — new decision matches a rejected proposal
  2. Topic contradictions — two active decisions on same topic with different conclusions
  3. Owner conflicts — same action assigned to different people in different decisions

When a conflict is found:

⚠️ DECISION CONFLICT
New: [text]
Conflicts with: [DATE] — [existing text]

Options: (1) Supersede old  (2) Merge  (3) Defer to founder

DO_NOT_RESURFACE enforcement:

🚫 BLOCKED: "[Proposal]" was rejected on [DATE]. Reason: [reason].
To reopen: founder must explicitly say "reopen [topic] from [DATE]".

Logging Workflow (Post Phase 5)

  1. Founder approves synthesis
  2. Write Layer 1 raw transcript → YYYY-MM-DD-raw.md
  3. Check conflicts against decisions.md
  4. Surface conflicts → wait for founder resolution
  5. Append approved entries to decisions.md
  6. Confirm: decisions logged, actions tracked, DO_NOT_RESURFACE flags added

Marking Actions Complete

- [x] [Action] — Owner: [name] — Completed: [DATE] — Result: [one sentence]

Never delete completed items. The history is the record.


File Structure

memory/board-meetings/
├── decisions.md       # Layer 2: append-only, founder-approved
├── YYYY-MM-DD-raw.md  # Layer 1: full transcript per meeting
└── archive/YYYY/      # Raw files after 90 days

References

  • templates/decision-entry.md — single entry template with field rules
  • scripts/decision_tracker.py — CLI parser, overdue tracker, conflict detector

Reviews

Overall rating

0.0
0.0

0 comments

No reviews yet