Skill Introduction

Overview

Route tasks through hooks_route, partition by Agent Booster availability, and report Tier 1 bypass utilization with $0 cost

Core value

Turns reusable Debugging know-how into an installable skill, helping users complete github, community, claude, mcp work faster.

Target users

Developers, testers, and maintainers who handle Debugging tasks in Focus Code.
Teams that already trust workflows or content from ruvnet.
Users who want standardized prompts, steps, or conventions instead of repeating setup work.

Best practices

Read the skill content first to confirm required inputs, expected outputs, and dependencies.
Try it on a small task before relying on it for critical work.
Add project-specific constraints such as coding style, target platform, test expectations, and delivery format.
For external sources, verify the source link, version, and recent maintenance activity.

Best use cases

Tasks related to github, community, claude, mcp that need a reusable execution flow.
Converting a community repo, team convention, or personal workflow into day-to-day assistance.
Starting from a proven skill instead of writing prompts or procedures from scratch.

Limits and boundaries

Results depend on the quality of the original skill content and may need human correction.
It does not replace code review, tests, security review, or professional judgment.
External tools, APIs, account permissions, and local dependencies still need separate setup.

Differentiation

Structured around Debugging, making it easier to discover and reuse than loose prompt snippets.
Marked as GitHub, which helps users judge trust and maintenance expectations.
Keeps the original source link available for repository, documentation, or discussion follow-up.
Tagged with github, community, claude, mcp, so it can be filtered by concrete task intent.

Install and use

Install

Copy Install Command

focus install cost-booster-route-f575e3

View source

Detail Preview

SKILL.md

Primary filemarkdown3 KB

name: cost-booster-route description: Route tasks through hooks_route, partition by Agent Booster availability, and report Tier 1 bypass utilization with $0 cost argument-hint: "[--from-recent] | <task-description>" allowed-tools: mcpclaude-flowhooks_route mcpclaude-flowmemory_search mcpclaude-flowmemory_list Bash

Cost Booster Route

Wraps mcp__claude-flow__hooks_route and reports how many tasks the 3-tier router classified as Agent Booster (Tier 1) eligible. Tier 1 bypasses run as WASM transforms — no LLM call, structurally $0 cost.

When to use

Before a batch of similar tasks, or when cost-report shows Sonnet/Opus spend on descriptions that look like simple transforms (var-to-const, add-types, add-error-handling, async-await, add-logging, remove-console).

Steps

Collect tasks — single arg or recent entries from cost-tracking via memory_search. Cap batch at 50.
Route each — call hooks_route with the description; capture the full response string.
Partition — group by whether the response contains the literal [AGENT_BOOSTER_AVAILABLE] (Tier 1) vs. not (Tier 2/3). Extract [TASK_MODEL_RECOMMENDATION] Use model="X" when present.
Compute spend — Tier 1 partition: $0. Tier 2/3 partition: per-task upper-bound from REFERENCE.md pricing × recommended model.

Report

=== Booster bypass report ===
Tasks analyzed:        50
Tier 1 (booster):      18 (36%)  — $0.00
Tier 2/3 (LLM):        32 (64%)  — $X.XX (upper-bound)
Booster intents:       var-to-const (8), add-types (5), remove-console (5)

Persist — memory_store --namespace cost-tracking --key "booster-route-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)" --value '{"tier1": N, "tier2_or_3": M, ...}' so cost-report picks up the tier signal.

Caveats — claimed upstream, not yet verified

[AGENT_BOOSTER_AVAILABLE] fires only when the upstream router populates routeResult.agentBoosterIntent.type (v3/@claude-flow/cli/src/mcp-tools/hooks-tools.ts:1228). The published CLI's semantic-VectorDb path does not always trigger the classifier — treat the partition as a lower bound on Tier 1 eligibility.
CLAUDE.md root claims <1ms latency and 352× faster than LLM. <1ms and $0 are structural; 352× is claimed upstream, not yet verified here. Report what the router actually returns.
See docs/benchmarks/0002-baseline.md for the full upstream-claims-vs-measured table.

Cross-references

ADR-0002 Decision #1 · ruflo-intelligence ADR-0001 §"Neutral" (closes the routing-outcomes loop via cost-optimize step 8) · CLAUDE.md root §"3-Tier Model Routing (ADR-026)".

cost booster route