Skill Market

automating ioc enrichment

'Automates the enrichment of raw indicators of compromise with multi-source threat intelligence context using

GitHub
githubcommunityai-agentsclaude-codecloud-securitycybersecuritydevsecopsethical-hacking
0.0
0 installs33.4K GitHub starsby mukul975

Skill Introduction

Overview
'Automates the enrichment of raw indicators of compromise with multi-source threat intelligence context using

Core value

Turns reusable Development know-how into an installable skill, helping users complete github, community, ai-agents, claude-code work faster.

Target users

  • Developers, testers, and maintainers who handle Development tasks in Focus Code.
  • Teams that already trust workflows or content from mukul975.
  • Users who want standardized prompts, steps, or conventions instead of repeating setup work.

Best practices

  • Read the skill content first to confirm required inputs, expected outputs, and dependencies.
  • Try it on a small task before relying on it for critical work.
  • Add project-specific constraints such as coding style, target platform, test expectations, and delivery format.
  • For external sources, verify the source link, version, and recent maintenance activity.

Best use cases

  • Tasks related to github, community, ai-agents, claude-code that need a reusable execution flow.
  • Converting a community repo, team convention, or personal workflow into day-to-day assistance.
  • Starting from a proven skill instead of writing prompts or procedures from scratch.

Limits and boundaries

  • Results depend on the quality of the original skill content and may need human correction.
  • It does not replace code review, tests, security review, or professional judgment.
  • External tools, APIs, account permissions, and local dependencies still need separate setup.

Differentiation

  • Structured around Development, making it easier to discover and reuse than loose prompt snippets.
  • Marked as GitHub, which helps users judge trust and maintenance expectations.
  • Keeps the original source link available for repository, documentation, or discussion follow-up.
  • Tagged with github, community, ai-agents, claude-code, so it can be filtered by concrete task intent.

Install and use

Install
Copy Install Command
focus install automating-ioc-enrichment-37a57d
View source

Detail Preview

SKILL.md

Primary filemarkdown9 KB

name: automating-ioc-enrichment description: 'Automates the enrichment of raw indicators of compromise with multi-source threat intelligence context using SOAR platforms, Python pipelines, or TIP playbooks to reduce analyst triage time and standardize enrichment outputs. Use when building automated enrichment workflows integrated with SIEM alerts, email submission pipelines, or bulk IOC processing from threat feeds. Activates for requests involving SOAR enrichment, Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, TheHive, Python enrichment pipelines, or automated IOC processing.

' domain: cybersecurity subdomain: threat-intelligence tags:

  • SOAR
  • enrichment
  • IOC
  • Cortex-XSOAR
  • Splunk-SOAR
  • VirusTotal
  • automation
  • CTI
  • NIST-CSF version: 1.0.0 author: team-cybersecurity license: Apache-2.0 nist_csf:
  • ID.RA-01
  • ID.RA-05
  • DE.CM-01
  • DE.AE-02

Automating IOC Enrichment

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Building a SOAR playbook that automatically enriches SIEM alerts with threat intelligence context before routing to analysts
  • Creating a Python pipeline for bulk IOC enrichment from phishing email submissions
  • Reducing analyst mean time to triage (MTTT) by pre-populating alert context with VT, Shodan, and MISP data

Do not use this skill for fully automated blocking decisions without human review — enrichment automation should inform decisions, not execute blocks autonomously for high-impact actions.

Prerequisites

  • SOAR platform (Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Tines, or n8n) or Python 3.9+ environment
  • API keys: VirusTotal, AbuseIPDB, Shodan, and at minimum one TIP (MISP or OpenCTI)
  • SIEM integration endpoint for alert consumption
  • Rate limit budgets documented per API (VT: 4/min free, 500/min enterprise)

Workflow

Step 1: Design Enrichment Pipeline Architecture

Define the enrichment flow for each IOC type:

SIEM Alert → Extract IOCs → Classify Type → Route to enrichment functions
  IP Address → AbuseIPDB + Shodan + VirusTotal IP + MISP
  Domain → VirusTotal Domain + PassiveTotal + Shodan + MISP
  URL → URLScan.io + VirusTotal URL + Google Safe Browse
  File Hash → VirusTotal Files + MalwareBazaar + MISP
→ Aggregate results → Calculate confidence score → Update alert → Notify analyst

Step 2: Implement Python Enrichment Functions

import requests
import time
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import Optional

RATE_LIMIT_DELAY = 0.25  # 4 requests/second for VT free tier

@dataclass
class EnrichmentResult:
    ioc_value: str
    ioc_type: str
    vt_malicious: int = 0
    vt_total: int = 0
    abuse_confidence: int = 0
    shodan_ports: list = field(default_factory=list)
    misp_events: list = field(default_factory=list)
    confidence_score: int = 0

def enrich_ip(ip: str, vt_key: str, abuse_key: str, shodan_key: str) -> EnrichmentResult:
    result = EnrichmentResult(ip, "ip")

    # VirusTotal IP lookup
    vt_resp = requests.get(
        f"https://www.virustotal.com/api/v3/ip_addresses/{ip}",
        headers={"x-apikey": vt_key}
    )
    if vt_resp.status_code == 200:
        stats = vt_resp.json()["data"]["attributes"]["last_analysis_stats"]
        result.vt_malicious = stats.get("malicious", 0)
        result.vt_total = sum(stats.values())

    time.sleep(RATE_LIMIT_DELAY)

    # AbuseIPDB
    abuse_resp = requests.get(
        "https://api.abuseipdb.com/api/v2/check",
        headers={"Key": abuse_key, "Accept": "application/json"},
        params={"ipAddress": ip, "maxAgeInDays": 90}
    )
    if abuse_resp.status_code == 200:
        result.abuse_confidence = abuse_resp.json()["data"]["abuseConfidenceScore"]

    # Calculate composite confidence score
    result.confidence_score = min(
        (result.vt_malicious / max(result.vt_total, 1)) * 60 +
        (result.abuse_confidence / 100) * 40, 100
    )

    return result

def enrich_hash(sha256: str, vt_key: str) -> EnrichmentResult:
    result = EnrichmentResult(sha256, "sha256")
    vt_resp = requests.get(
        f"https://www.virustotal.com/api/v3/files/{sha256}",
        headers={"x-apikey": vt_key}
    )
    if vt_resp.status_code == 200:
        stats = vt_resp.json()["data"]["attributes"]["last_analysis_stats"]
        result.vt_malicious = stats.get("malicious", 0)
        result.vt_total = sum(stats.values())
        result.confidence_score = int((result.vt_malicious / max(result.vt_total, 1)) * 100)
    return result

Step 3: Build SOAR Playbook (Cortex XSOAR)

In Cortex XSOAR, create an enrichment playbook:

  1. Trigger: Alert created in SIEM (via webhook or polling)
  2. Extract IOCs: Use "Extract Indicators" task with regex patterns for IP, domain, URL, hash
  3. Parallel enrichment: Fan-out to multiple enrichment tasks simultaneously
  4. VT Enrichment: Call !vt-file-scan or !vt-ip-scan commands
  5. AbuseIPDB check: Call !abuseipdb-check-ip command
  6. MISP Lookup: Call !misp-search for cross-referencing
  7. Score aggregation: Python transform task computing composite score
  8. Conditional routing: If score ≥70 → High Priority queue; if 40–69 → Medium; <40 → Auto-close with note
  9. Alert enrichment: Write enrichment results to alert context for analyst view

Step 4: Handle Rate Limiting and Failures

import time
from functools import wraps

def rate_limited(max_per_second):
    min_interval = 1.0 / max_per_second
    def decorator(func):
        last_called = [0.0]
        @wraps(func)
        def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
            elapsed = time.time() - last_called[0]
            wait = min_interval - elapsed
            if wait > 0:
                time.sleep(wait)
            result = func(*args, **kwargs)
            last_called[0] = time.time()
            return result
        return wrapper
    return decorator

def retry_on_429(max_retries=3):
    def decorator(func):
        @wraps(func)
        def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
            for attempt in range(max_retries):
                response = func(*args, **kwargs)
                if response.status_code == 429:
                    retry_after = int(response.headers.get("Retry-After", 60))
                    time.sleep(retry_after)
                else:
                    return response
        return wrapper
    return decorator

Step 5: Metrics and Tuning

Track pipeline performance weekly:

  • Enrichment latency: Target <30 seconds from alert trigger to enriched output
  • API success rate: Target >99% (identify rate limit or outage events)
  • True positive rate: Track analyst overrides of automated confidence scores
  • Cost: Track API call volume against budget (VT Enterprise: $X per 1M lookups)

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
SOARSecurity Orchestration, Automation, and Response — platform for automating security workflows and integrating disparate tools
Enrichment PlaybookAutomated workflow sequence that adds contextual intelligence to raw security events
Rate LimitingAPI provider restrictions on request frequency (e.g., VT free: 4 requests/minute); pipelines must respect these limits
Composite Confidence ScoreSingle score aggregating signals from multiple enrichment sources using weighted formula
Fan-out PatternParallel execution of multiple enrichment queries simultaneously to minimize total enrichment latency

Tools & Systems

  • Cortex XSOAR (Palo Alto): Enterprise SOAR with 700+ marketplace integrations including VT, MISP, Shodan, and AbuseIPDB
  • Splunk SOAR (Phantom): SOAR platform with Python-based playbooks; native Splunk SIEM integration
  • Tines: No-code SOAR platform with webhook-driven automation; cost-effective for smaller teams
  • TheHive + Cortex: Open-source IR/enrichment platform with observable enrichment via Cortex analyzers

Common Pitfalls

  • Blocking on enrichment latency: If enrichment takes >5 minutes, analysts start working unenriched alerts, defeating the purpose. Set timeout limits and provide partial results.
  • No caching: Querying the same IOC 50 times generates unnecessary API costs. Cache enrichment results for 24 hours by default.
  • Ignoring API failures silently: Failed enrichment calls should be logged and trigger fallback logic, not silently produce empty results that appear as clean IOCs.
  • Automating blocks on enrichment score alone: Composite scores contain false positives; require human confirmation for blocking decisions against shared infrastructure.

Reviews

Overall rating

0.0
0.0

0 comments

No reviews yet